My take on Perry and
secession treason, Obama’s repeated pivoting, the Wisconsin recall, and the extremely unpopular Congress. If you want to receive my adVantage Points every weekday morning in your inbox, email email@example.com
Wisconsin Recall Election Today – story
In the Badger State, working people are tired of being badgered by Republican demagogues taking from the middle class and giving to the rich. Regardless of the outcome in the recall elections, there’s no question the anti-worker policies of Republicans nationwide have fired up the electorate, making 2012 a very tough year for the GOP.
Congressional Approval Rating at Historic Low - story
Enough talk about Obama’s approval rating. He looks like Mr. Popularity compared with Congress. Commentators need to spend a bit more time talking about Congressional approval ratings — especially the heinously low approval of Republicans in Congress.
Obama Really Shifting Tone This Time? - story
I’d love to see Obama shift to aggressively fighting for jobs and the middle class and calling out the GOP for their pro-super rich elitist agenda. But if you claim to “pivot” every week, those pivots look less and less pivotal.
1. Did policies initiated by President George W. Bush deplete the budget surplus and create the current deficit and, if so, how can you justify pretending to be a deficit hawk now?
2. Thanks to your gargantuan tax cuts, the richest of the rich are doing better than ever while everyone else is struggling. If they aren’t already creating jobs under existing historic tax breaks, what makes you think they’ll start creating jobs if you give them more tax cuts?
3. Since the vast majority of Americans — and most Republican voters — support raising taxes on the rich, what on earth makes you think Obama has a “weak hand” when it comes to this issue?
Really, I’d like to know.
My thoughts on unemployment rate, debt negotiations, 14th Amendment option, space shuttle launch and Texas execution of a Mexican citizen >> By the way, if you want to receive my adVantage Points every weekday morning in your inbox, email firstname.lastname@example.org
Unemployment Rate Edges Up to 9.2% - story
Wall Street profits and CEO bonuses are at record highs this year. But unemployment continues to plague middle class Americans. Oooooh, I know — let’s give the rich people more tax breaks! ’Cuz that already worked well so far…
Now we can stop talking about Weiner, but we have to keep talking about the larger issue. Men in power all too frequently abuse their positions and exploit women. The Congressman is stepping down, but unfortunately there are plenty of other wieners in Washington.
I have a piece up on Mediaite explaining that Nancy Pelosi has come under attack NOT because she failed but because she succeeded — and her success threatened the Tea Party’s death grip on the status quo.
“I’m not saying I don’t wish, like many progressives, that health care reform had included a public option, that the stimulus package would have been bigger and included more infrastructure jobs and that financial reform would have been even tougher. But considering what she did pass—and certainly compared with decades of destructive conservative policies that preceded her—it’s certainly possible to celebrate Pelosi’s great accomplishments while at the same time wishing they had been even greater.”
You can read the rest of the piece here.
Sometimes the truth is so plain, even a two-year-old knows it. In this video, my daughter, Willa Hansen-Kohn, explains why the Bush-era tax breaks for the rich should be allowed to expire. As they say, from the mouths of babes….
Spread it around!
I have a new post up on the Fox News opinion page about the small but significant overlapping reform agenda between Progressives and the Tea Party. Here’s an excerpt:
“These three actions would dramatically curtail the corrupting influence of special interests in government and society and return power to the people. Then we can return to our respective ideological corners to fight over tax cuts versus public infrastructure or the future of gays and guns — but at least we’d be fighting fair, with the outcomes truly determined by public will as opposed to which side’s outsized corporate influence throws its weight behind which argument.”
Read the entire piece here.
As the saying goes, “With friends like these, who needs enemies?” Sometimes, cliché though it sounds, a cliché is just what’s needed to express a sentiment. And so it goes in the beleaguered relationship between the Democratic Party and grassroots progressive organizations.
Last week, the particularly beleaguered Harry Reid tacked an amendment onto a jobs and education bill that would expand funding for teachers and increase federal matching funds for state Medicaid expenses but would pay for the spending by cutting food stamps. The bill, with the amendment in tact, achieved cloture this morning — meaning that enough Senators voted to stop debating the bill and move forward to actually vote yeah or nay on the legislation.
But for once, the most interesting aspect of this legislation is not the horse trading to win a single Republican vote in a barely Democratic Senate. What’s most interesting is the contours of the corner into which Democrats backed progressive advocates.
Admittedly, progressive activists are accustomed to internecine battles, but usually these pit one arguably distinct interest group against another. When asked to sideline the needs of, say, poor black folks or undocumented immigrants and prioritize the needs of working class white folks, unfortunately few groups in Washington bat an eye. As a whole, us liberals tend to practice a “lowest hanging fruit politics” — which often translates to helping the higher placed fruit on the socioeconomic scale and letting the rest of the bunch rot.
For most liberals, then, the choice to support health care reform that would help mostly white, working class folks, while conceding to bars on access to abortions that would hurt mostly poor women of color was a no-brainer. But with the food stamps versus teachers and state aid tradeoff, it’s hard to make a case for the low hanging fruit of funding teachers and health care while denying poor people food — food like fruit.
Behind the scenes, progressive activists weren’t sure what to do. Some usually united coalitions bickered, with parts mobilizing to support the teacher and health care aid while their colleagues waved their arms in dismay that these leaders were, in effect, supporting cuts to food stamps. Accordingly, many progressive groups did nothing at all or officially took the position of having no official position. Meanwhile, the unions had perhaps adopted the clever “don’t worry” stance. According to Firedog Lake, on one strategy call, Chuck Lovelace, the Legislative Director for AFSCME (American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees), noted that since the food stamp cuts wouldn’t take effect until 2015, there would be time to restore the funding. “We intend to go back and work to restore that benefit at the appropriate time… From my union’s perspective, we will go back and get that back.” Yes, because presumably we’ll be in a much better position if the Republicans control one or both branches of Congress….
A progressive activist friend called me about this, frustrated feeling pinned in the middle — by our own supposed political allies nonetheless — and said that at least the poor kids who lose their food stamps will be able to go to school and eat paste. Indeed, while some Democrats (not to mention the oligarchic Republicans) seriously debate whether to kill the Bush era tax cuts for the richest of the super rich, we’re forcing children across the nation to get their nutrients from Elmer’s Glue. That is, if the schools have enough money to buy glue.
Of course, we wouldn’t be in this situation if Democrats and President Obama hadn’t given in to the manufactured hysteria around deficit spending. Forty prominent economists recently agreed that while fiscal deficits are certainly a long-term concern, the United States will never balance its budget if it cannot first stimulate the economy through emergency spending. That means ambitious programs to fund public jobs, including teachers but also public works projects and new economic innovation, and establish strong safety nets for those who continue to struggle in our struggling economy. Jumpstarting our economy means putting the pedal to the metal, not easing up on food stamps to give a little gas to education. And if we have to take even more money from the exceedingly wealthy in our country who have already benefited from a strong economy and government policies that helped them grow their business and wealth, it’s only fair. Working class and poor Americans are already sacrificing too much in these tough times. To cut food stamps is an ugly additional blow. Instead of picking sides in a losing battle, progressives need to argue not just for revoking the Bush-era tax cuts but increasing taxes on the super rich. The rest of America needs the money. And don’t worry, the super rich have plenty to eat besides paste.
NEW YORK TIMES PROFILE
JOIN SALLY’S EMAIL LIST
FOR A GOOD TIME, FOLLOW
RUMORS ABOUT MELoading Quotes...
TV DOESN’T PAY THE BILLSMake a tax-deductible contribution via our fiscal sponsor, the Grassroots Policy Project
POPULAR TAGS2012 Election 2012 Elections barack obama budget capitalism civility Congress corporations debate debt deficit democrats economy feminism financial reform Fox News gay rights Glenn Beck government greed ideology inequality jobs marriage equality Mitt Romney Obama occupy wall st occupy wall street Paul Ryan popular education populism president obama progressive protests race racism Republicans Right wing sexism social movements taxes Tea Party unions values Wall Street