This morning, I was planning to write an aggressive defense of conservative political commentator S.E. Cupp, who was recently viciously maligned by the porn rag Hustler which Photoshopped a picture of Cupp with a penis in her mouth (please don’t Google said picture, it only feeds the beast).
I still plan to defend S.E. and express my horror that Hustler or anyone for that matter would attack any woman, of any political stripe, simply for expressing her view points.
But now, I have to express dismay that after simply tweeting my support for S.E. yesterday and my outrage at Hustler, I was hit with a barrage of tweets from conservatives. In addition to bizarrely accusing me of trying to “co-opt” the situation, many of those who tweeted at me resented my assertion that sexist attacks come from both the right and the left. Just a few highlights:
Hi @sallykohn: You’re not surprised by Leftists’ #GenderTreason attacks on conservative women, are you? ~ @secupp
— Adam Baldwin (@adamsbaldwin) May 24, 2012
@kssturgis62 @secupp what the heck are you talking about. Sexist attacks come from left and right. Wrong either way
— Sally Kohn (@sallykohn) May 24, 2012
@sallykohn @Van_Blogodidact @adamsbaldwin @secupp Progressives equate a gnat with an elephant, and that makes all things equal?
— Edwin F. Buckley (@OHenrysStepchld) May 24, 2012
First of all, it’s worth noting that S.E. has I think appropriately and graciously embraced the defenses of her from the left as evidenced by her Twitter feed. The attacks on my original statement had definitively more of a Michelle Malkin-esque tone to them. After all, Michelle has long tried to make the case that racist and sexist smears come more from the left than the right. This is, of course, to anyone who has studied history around the periods of the civil rights movement and the women’s movement, a hysterical assertion. Moreover its incongruous with other conservative smears against liberals, including the assertion that liberals are the politically correct thought police. Pick a characterization and stick with it, won’t you?
But no matter. I have said on air to Michelle and will say here again that I don’t think it matters who gets worse hate mail or who gets called nastier names by radio talk show hosts. Sexism is sexism, whatever side it’s aimed at. Racism is racism. Period. Anyone who doesn’t believe conservatives vociferously and voluminously sling the same sorts of slanderous mud at progressives should check out my inbox — or, probably much worse, the inboxes of Soledad O’Brien and Rachel Maddow. Heck, folks, I’ve been called racist slurs in hate mail and I’m as white as they come. The fact of the matter is that people on both sides of the political aisle all-too-easily resort to fanning the flames of bias and hate in attempting to try and shut down their opponents — but especially women, people of color and gay folks — from speaking up. It’s shameful and we should all condemn it.
In a Feministing post (retweeted by S.E. herself), Zerlina Maxwell writes:
Women are under attack from all sides and no matter what political party you are in, I’m going to defend you from sexist attacks. I will not stand by in silence when a woman, any woman, is attacked in this way and belittled as nothing more than a sexual object. It’s about disagreement over ideas; smearing and demeaning women should not part of the equation.
Exactly. Which brings me to feminism. Feminism is based on the simple premise that women and men should be treated equally. Any female political commentator, whether on the left or the right, receives daily reminders of how far we are from that goal. The attack against S.E. is only the latest, particularly egregious example. At the same time, the fact that we even have prominent women leaders like Sarah Palin and Michele Bachmann who use their prominence to attack the feminist movement is a sign of how much feminism has transformed America for the better. Yet the ways in which those women — and Hillary Clinton and Debbie Wasserman Schultz – are treated also shows us how far we have yet to go.
So perhaps the next time Michelle Malkin professes to be defending the interests of women from “feminazis” and “femagogues”, she and others would be wise to remember that not only have feminists long been the ones to stand up against these sorts of hateful attacks but that we wouldn’t even have female political voices and leaders were it not for the advances of feminism. It’s understandable that some conservative women want to try and rewrite history to pretend conservatives were the heroes for women’s equality more often than the villains they actually were, but the fact that Michelle Malkin and others like her even have a platform at all is in no small part because of feminism. It’s a shame that in the wake of a sexist attack that undermines all women, some conservative men and women want to turn around and attack progressive women. But I guess solidarity just sounds too socialist….
Anyway, ideology be damned, I know S.E. Cupp to be a kind and intelligent opponent. #IStandWithSECupp against any vicious attack against a woman for speaking her mind. Sign the Women’s Media Center petition against Hustler here (which includes a great statement from Gloria Steinem in defense of S.E.) and let’s all work to put a modicum of civility back in our politics and discourse.
The issue isn’t how Bain Capital and Mitt Romney got rich by taking over small businesses, breaking them up and selling off the bits for profit. The issue is what would happen if we structured our entire economy around that model:
In the wake of the sentencing of Dharun Ravi for alleged bias crimes leading to the death of Tyler Clemente, I wrote an essay for Fox News’ opinion page about why, as a progressive, I oppose enhanced sentencing hate crimes laws — and believe we all should.
I fundamentally believe that the way to root out bias crime in America and bias in general is by acknowledging all of our inherent prejudices and judgments and dealing with them openly.
In that case, hate crimes laws create a sort of false comfort that suggests we are not infected by nor furthering bias unless we’re blurting out epithets or scrawling hate screeds. That’s a dangerous and ultimately defeatist message to send to a society that has much work to do in rooting out discrimination from every crevice of our existence, not just in crime.
I’m thrilled that the United States helped dissident activist Chen Guangchen flee China. Now why aren’t we as hospitable to other immigrants who want to come to America, including undocumented immigrants seeking a better life for their families? Questions raised by this infographic:
Darn those conservatives are paranoid…. From Fox News Watch.
The fun part comes around the 5:45 mark!
This one offered without comment.
I’ve launched a new video series, called POLITICAL Public Service Announcements (#PPSA for short) to share what I think are vital clarifications on key issues of the day. In the first in the series, I address the myth that progressives and Occupy activists hate wealth. Nothing could be further from the truth.
Check it out and please help spread it around:
From my discussion today on America Live with Megyn Kelly and Monica Crowley. Does race affect the way voters judge President Obama? Yes. And saying so isn’t “divisive” but the first step in rooting out implicit bias from our unconscious and our politics.
Your thoughts?
And here’s the Mediaite story on this segment.
In my latest Fox News opinion column, I write:
If you haven’t talked with one lately, most Republicans are up in arms that the media is covering several alleged bullying incidents by Mitt Romney when he was in high school. Conservatives allege that the liberal media is tearing Romney limb from limb while then-candidate Obama was never really vetted.
Exsqueeze me?
What’s behind their complaints?
Those who argue that President Obama was never vetted clearly aren’t referring to a process of information gathering and investigation, they’re referring to desired outcome that has yet and will not come. To them, it’s not that the vetting process happened and the president passed but, rather, that the process was flawed and never seriously took place yet. Sore losers, really.
Governor Mike Huckabee insists that tradition should dictate against extending equal rights to same sex couples. Then again, tradition should have kept women from voting and maintained slavery. So, er, uh….
What do you think?
JOIN SALLY’S EMAIL LIST
RUMORS ABOUT ME
Loading Quotes...POPULAR TAGS
2012 Election 2012 Elections barack obama budget capitalism Congress contraception corporations debt deficit economy feminism financial reform Fox News gay rights Glenn Beck government greed ideology inequality jobs marriage equality Mitt Romney movement building Obama occupy wall st occupy wall street OWS popular education populism president obama progressive protests race racism Republicans Right wing sexism Showdown in America social movements taxes Tea Party unions values Wall Street













